<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wind Power Solutions &#187; global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/tag/global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com</link>
	<description>Wind Power Solutions for your home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal climate op-ed: the &quot;equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology&quot;</title>
		<link>http://news.mongabay.com/2012/0206-hance_wsj_climateoped.html</link>
		<comments>http://news.mongabay.com/2012/0206-hance_wsj_climateoped.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Hance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeremy hance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronauts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dentists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Response Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urgent Concern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/?guid=d73bb8c398e5592f0e9695ae63c5f468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate scientists have struck back at the Wall Street Journal after it published an op-ed authored by 16 mostly non-climatologists arguing that global warming was not an urgent concern. The response letter, entitled Check With Climate Scientists for V...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Climate scientists have struck back at the Wall Street Journal after it published an op-ed authored by 16 mostly non-climatologists arguing that global warming was not an urgent concern. The response letter, entitled Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate, responds that the Wall Street Journal should seek input on global warming from climate scientists. Six of the 16 authors who published the original article have ties to Exxon Mobil and their professions range from engineers to astronauts. In turn the letter to Wall Street Journal was signed by 38 well-noted climatologists. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/wall-street-journal-climate-op-ed-the-equivalent-of-dentists-practicing-cardiology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GHGs and Where They Are</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/nC4OxdV5t4Q/43836</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/nC4OxdV5t4Q/43836#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Soos, ENN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghg Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial Suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petroleum Refineries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Methods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/regulatory/article/43836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In January 2012, for the first time, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released greenhouse gas (GHG) data collected under the GHG Reporting Program. GHG is primarily Carbon Dioxide but includes many other other chemicals such as methane.  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In January 2012, for the first time, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released greenhouse gas (GHG) data collected under the GHG Reporting Program. GHG is primarily Carbon Dioxide but includes many other other chemicals such as methane.  The data shows 2010 U.S. GHG emissions from large industrial facilities, and from suppliers of certain fossil fuels and industrial gases. Reporting entities used uniform methods for estimating emissions, which enables data to be compared and analyzed. The data shows the larger GHG emitters are power plants followed by petroleum refineries. GHG data are now easily accessible to the public through the EPA’s GHG Reporting Program. The 2010 GHG data to be released includes public information from facilities in nine industry groups that directly emit large quantities of GHGs, as well as suppliers of certain fossil fuels and high global warming gases.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/nC4OxdV5t4Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/ghgs-and-where-they-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Temperature Rising: Warming Arctic Permafrost Fuels Climate Change Worries</title>
		<link>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=c55e57194b403d2914d2c1f967c9918c</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=c55e57194b403d2914d2c1f967c9918c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By JUSTIN GILLIS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arctic Regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic Permafrost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Hemisphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worries Experts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/17/science/earth/warming-arctic-permafrost-fuels-climate-change-worries.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts worry that if the permafrost thaws in the Northern Hemisphere, huge amounts of carbon will be released into the air, greatly intensifying global warming.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Experts worry that if the permafrost thaws in the Northern Hemisphere, huge amounts of carbon will be released into the air, greatly intensifying global warming.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=c55e57194b403d2914d2c1f967c9918c&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=c55e57194b403d2914d2c1f967c9918c&p=1"/></a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/temperature-rising-warming-arctic-permafrost-fuels-climate-change-worries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2011/12/17/us/JP-PERMAFROST-1/JP-PERMAFROST-1-thumbStandard.jpg" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Direct air capture of CO2 to fight global warming is too expensive to be feasible</title>
		<link>http://news.mongabay.com/2011/1209-co2_air_capture.html</link>
		<comments>http://news.mongabay.com/2011/1209-co2_air_capture.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rhett Butler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Of Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Burning Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Academy Of Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proceedings Of The National Academy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smokestacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/?guid=0b405d706e7c55898648254ea8276a90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using existing technology to 'scrub' carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere is far costlier than capturing emissions directly from the smokestacks of coal-burning power plants, reports a paper published this week in the Proceedings of the National...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Using existing technology to 'scrub' carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere is far costlier than capturing emissions directly from the smokestacks of coal-burning power plants, reports a paper published this week in the <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</i>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/direct-air-capture-of-co2-to-fight-global-warming-is-too-expensive-to-be-feasible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN Climate deal reached in Durban</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/reReNn_h9Io/43694</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/reReNn_h9Io/43694#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nina Chestney and Jon Herskovitz, Reuters, DURBAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ambition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binding Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blushes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Negotiators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developing Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Pact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowest Common Denominator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polluters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poor Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rising Sea Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Island States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewardship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/environmental_policy/article/43694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate negotiators agreed a pact on Sunday that would for the first time force all the biggest polluters to take action on greenhouse gas emissions, but critics said the action plan was not aggressive enough to slow the pace of global warming.
       ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Climate negotiators agreed a pact on Sunday that would for the first time force all the biggest polluters to take action on greenhouse gas emissions, but critics said the action plan was not aggressive enough to slow the pace of global warming.
            
            The package of accords extended the Kyoto Protocol, the only global pact that enforces carbon cuts, agreed the format of a fund to help poor countries tackle climate change and mapped out a path to a legally binding agreement on emissions reductions.
            
            But many small island states and developing nations at risk of being swamped by rising sea levels and extreme weather said the deal marked the lowest common denominator possible and lacked the ambition needed to ensure their survival.
            
            Agreement on the package, reached in the early hours of Sunday, avoided a collapse of the talks and spared the blushes of host South Africa, whose stewardship of the two weeks of often fractious negotiations came under fire from rich and poor nations.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/reReNn_h9Io" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/un-climate-deal-reached-in-durban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. Climate Conference close to deal on Climate Fund</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/B9T0eGacz1c/43678</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/B9T0eGacz1c/43678#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nina Chestney and Barbara Lewis, Reuters, DURBAN, South Africa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developing Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Effort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollow Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operational Details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poor States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/regulatory/article/43678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Negotiators are close to agreeing the shape of a Green Climate Fund, which is designed to help poor nations tackle global warming and nudge them towards a new global effort to fight climate change.
                                    
                 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Negotiators are close to agreeing the shape of a Green Climate Fund, which is designed to help poor nations tackle global warming and nudge them towards a new global effort to fight climate change.
                                    
                                    Rich countries have pledged up to $100 billion a year by 2020 to aid poor states most directly affected by rising global temperatures to adapt their economies and protect themselves from adverse weather.
                                    
                                    But critics say it could remain a hollow shell unless there is also agreement on where the actual funds come from -- and how the money is spent.
                                    
                                    "I have a fair amount of confidence this is going to get done in a positive way," U.S. climate envoy Todd Stern told reporters on Wednesday. Only a few technical operational details remained to be thrashed out, he said.
                                    
                                    China has said it wants the fund set up before it will make its domestic climate efforts binding under an international agreement from 2020. Other important developing countries also want the fund's design agreed in Durban.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/B9T0eGacz1c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/u-n-climate-conference-close-to-deal-on-climate-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At least 74 percent of current warming caused by us</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/CTHS6u9Kd7o/43663</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/CTHS6u9Kd7o/43663#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Hance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric Aerosols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Quarters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/climate/article/43663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new methodology to tease out how much current climate change is linked to human activities has added to the consensus that behind global warming is us. The study, published in Nature Geoscience found that humans have caused at least three-quarters (7...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new methodology to tease out how much current climate change is linked to human activities has added to the consensus that behind global warming is us. The study, published in Nature Geoscience found that humans have caused at least three-quarters (74 percent) of current warming, while also determining that warming has actually been slowed down by atmospheric aerosols, including some pollutants, which reflect sunlight back into space.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/CTHS6u9Kd7o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/at-least-74-percent-of-current-warming-caused-by-us-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At least 74 percent of current warming caused by us</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/CTHS6u9Kd7o/43663</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/CTHS6u9Kd7o/43663#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Hance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric Aerosols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Quarters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/climate/article/43663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new methodology to tease out how much current climate change is linked to human activities has added to the consensus that behind global warming is us. The study, published in Nature Geoscience found that humans have caused at least three-quarters (7...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new methodology to tease out how much current climate change is linked to human activities has added to the consensus that behind global warming is us. The study, published in Nature Geoscience found that humans have caused at least three-quarters (74 percent) of current warming, while also determining that warming has actually been slowed down by atmospheric aerosols, including some pollutants, which reflect sunlight back into space.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/CTHS6u9Kd7o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/at-least-74-percent-of-current-warming-caused-by-us-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At least 74 percent of current warming caused by us</title>
		<link>http://news.mongabay.com/2011/1205-hance_climate_human.html</link>
		<comments>http://news.mongabay.com/2011/1205-hance_climate_human.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Hance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeremy hance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric Aerosols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Quarters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/?guid=00de33fad82dd01fece99e795d5d4fd8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new methodology to tease out how much current climate change is linked to human activities has added to the consensus that behind global warming is us. The study, published in Nature Geoscience found that humans have caused at least three-quarters (7...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new methodology to tease out how much current climate change is linked to human activities has added to the consensus that behind global warming is us. The study, published in Nature Geoscience found that humans have caused at least three-quarters (74 percent) of current warming, while also determining that warming has actually been slowed down by atmospheric aerosols, including some pollutants, which reflect sunlight back into space. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/at-least-74-percent-of-current-warming-caused-by-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the Kyoto Protocol be saved?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/teEpmzbwp14/43621</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/teEpmzbwp14/43621#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Herskovitz, Reuters, DURBAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binding Emissions Targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coastal City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commitment Period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crop Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developing Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Climate Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intense Storms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Chance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Ditch Effort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loggerheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Period Ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rising Sea Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Gap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/environmental_policy/article/43621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Countries will make a last ditch effort to save a dying Kyoto Protocol at global climate talks starting on Monday aimed at cutting the greenhouse gas emissions blamed by scientists for rising sea levels, intense storms and crop failures.
            
 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Countries will make a last ditch effort to save a dying Kyoto Protocol at global climate talks starting on Monday aimed at cutting the greenhouse gas emissions blamed by scientists for rising sea levels, intense storms and crop failures.
            
            Kyoto, which was adopted in 1997 and entered into force in 2005, commits most developed states to binding emissions targets. The talks are the last chance to set another round of targets before the first commitment period ends in 2012.
            
            Major parties have been at loggerheads for years, warnings of climate disaster are becoming more dire and diplomats worry whether host South Africa is up to the challenge of brokering the tough discussions among nearly 200 countries that run from Monday to December 9 in the coastal city of Durban.
            
            There is hope for a deal to help developing countries most hurt by global warming and a stop-gap measure to save the protocol. There is also a chance advanced economies responsible for most emissions will pledge deeper cuts at the talks known as the Conference of the Parties, or COP 17.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/teEpmzbwp14" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/can-the-kyoto-protocol-be-saved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Blog: How Much Will the Earth Warm Up?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d38aa857520f12fdf57ae3ad97489d61</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d38aa857520f12fdf57ae3ad97489d61#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By RACHEL NUWER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[coastal erosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research/Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea-level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/24/how-much-will-the-earth-warm-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new paper suggests global warming will be on the low side of previous estimates.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new paper suggests global warming will be on the low side of previous estimates.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=d38aa857520f12fdf57ae3ad97489d61&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=d38aa857520f12fdf57ae3ad97489d61&p=1"/></a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/green-blog-how-much-will-the-earth-warm-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic woes no excuse for climate inaction, says China</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/h7qfRsAKpm8/43600</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/h7qfRsAKpm8/43600#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Stanway, Reuters, BEIJING</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Turmoil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Woes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Unrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rising Sea Levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Extremes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/sustainability/article/43600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economic problems in Europe and elsewhere should not get in the way of a new pact to fight global warming, China's top climate official said on Tuesday ahead of major climate talks in South Africa.
            
            Delegates from nearly 200 cou...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Economic problems in Europe and elsewhere should not get in the way of a new pact to fight global warming, China's top climate official said on Tuesday ahead of major climate talks in South Africa.
            
            Delegates from nearly 200 countries meet from Monday till Dec 9 in Durban as part of marathon U.N.-led negotiations on a broader pact to curb growing greenhouse gas emissions as the world faces rising sea levels and greater weather extremes.
            
            "After the financial crisis, every country has had its problems, but these problems are just temporary," Xie Zhenhua, vice-director of the National Development and Reform Commission, told reporters on Tuesday.
            
            Officials in Beijing have suggested economic turmoil in Europe and political unrest in North Africa have pushed climate change far down the list of global priorities, overshadowing next week's talks and undermining plans to provide cash and technical support to poor nations to adapt to climate change.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/h7qfRsAKpm8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/economic-woes-no-excuse-for-climate-inaction-says-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dot Earth Blog: Climate Panel Charts Extreme Weather in a Warming World</title>
		<link>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e00f3949a29713884c1ef63f2afab65f</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e00f3949a29713884c1ef63f2afab65f#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By ANDREW C. REVKIN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters and Emergencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricanes and Tropical Storms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pachauri, Rajendra K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third World and Developing Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conclusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyclones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat Waves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Rains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panel Charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/18/climate-panel-issues-report-on-extreme-weather-and-climate-change/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A panel reinforces conclusions that human-driven global warming is intensifying heat waves and heavy rains now, with much more in the offing.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A panel reinforces conclusions that human-driven global warming is intensifying heat waves and heavy rains now, with much more in the offing.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=e00f3949a29713884c1ef63f2afab65f&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=e00f3949a29713884c1ef63f2afab65f&p=1"/></a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/dot-earth-blog-climate-panel-charts-extreme-weather-in-a-warming-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Extremes to Come</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/BTc_rb-hM2w/43588</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/BTc_rb-hM2w/43588#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Soos, ENN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Extremes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floods And Droughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat Waves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change Ipcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Phenomena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/enn_original_news/article/43588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The weather has always been an interesting variable in the lives of every person.  What impact will global warming have?  Will there more extreme weather behavior?  A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says that an inc...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The weather has always been an interesting variable in the lives of every person.  What impact will global warming have?  Will there more extreme weather behavior?  A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says that an increase in heat waves as well as hurricanes, floods, and droughts will likely become more intense in the next century. The United Nations IPCC's new special report on extreme weather, which includes a range of possible scenarios based on future greenhouse gas emissions, urges governments worldwide to draft plans to minimize the likely human and economic costs of these weather phenomena.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/BTc_rb-hM2w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/climate-extremes-to-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dot Earth Blog: Science and the Dangerous Climate Question</title>
		<link>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=db6ad91cdd7ea466efc56a955a2bc322</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=db6ad91cdd7ea466efc56a955a2bc322#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By ANDREW C. REVKIN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Caldeira, Ken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Aeronautics and Space Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/17/scienc-and-the-dangerous-climate-question/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A climate scientist explains why science cannot define how much global warming is too much.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A climate scientist explains why science cannot define how much global warming is too much.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=db6ad91cdd7ea466efc56a955a2bc322&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=db6ad91cdd7ea466efc56a955a2bc322&p=1"/></a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/dot-earth-blog-science-and-the-dangerous-climate-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Blog: Do Aerosols Only Add to Global Warming? 2 Views</title>
		<link>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=5f61d4d14d6130d0a891778a1ec4c366</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=5f61d4d14d6130d0a891778a1ec4c366#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By JIM ROBBINS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans and Seas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aerosols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dry Regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rain And Snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study Suggests That]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wetter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/good-cop-bad-cop-2-views-of-aerosol-and-climate-change/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests that aerosols can make dry regions even drier and worsen rain and snow in wetter regions. A different study says aerosols' cloud-thickening effects, however, help block sunlight that might otherwise warm the planet.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new study suggests that aerosols can make dry regions even drier and worsen rain and snow in wetter regions. A different study says aerosols' cloud-thickening effects, however, help block sunlight that might otherwise warm the planet.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=5f61d4d14d6130d0a891778a1ec4c366&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=5f61d4d14d6130d0a891778a1ec4c366&p=1"/></a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/green-blog-do-aerosols-only-add-to-global-warming-2-views/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadcasters lose their nerve over BBC&#8217;s climate change program</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/Yc7tDXzzNwo/43567</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/Yc7tDXzzNwo/43567#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consequences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frozen Planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ice Caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Many Fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir David Attenborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tv Channels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/climate/article/43567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final episode of the BBC's Frozen Planet documentary series that focuses on climate change has been canned in the US and other countries, prompting fierce criticism.
                        
                        All seven episodes of the multi-m...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The final episode of the BBC's Frozen Planet documentary series that focuses on climate change has been canned in the US and other countries, prompting fierce criticism.
                        
                        All seven episodes of the multi-million pound nature series, written and presented by Sir David Attenborough, will be screened in the UK – but the final show, entitled 'On Thin Ice', has been shelved by several foreign TV channels, including the Discovery channel in the US.
                        
                        The last programme in the series looks at the man-made threat to the environment and examines how Earth's ice caps are changing and the likely consequences for the rest of the planet.
                        
                        But US audiences will not be shown the final episode, where many fear a show that promotes the theory of global warming could upset viewers.
                        
                        The package of six episodes has been sold to 30 countries and networks were provided with the option to buy a seventh 'optional extra' episode, along with behind-the-scenes footage.
                        
                        The documentary series is said to be an epic portrait of two disappearing wildernesses – the Arctic and the Antarctic - before they change forever, and is already hugely popular with viewers in the UK.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/Yc7tDXzzNwo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/broadcasters-lose-their-nerve-over-bbcs-climate-change-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dot Earth Blog: Closeup: Climate Extremes and Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8119f5234b64ee70479a257f61c2d675</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8119f5234b64ee70479a257f61c2d675#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By ANDREW C. REVKIN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters and Emergencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maldives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Extremes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme Weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/closeup-climate-extremes-and-global-warming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A climate scientist explores the challenges in charting climate extremes in a warming world.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A climate scientist explores the challenges in charting climate extremes in a warming world.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=8119f5234b64ee70479a257f61c2d675&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=8119f5234b64ee70479a257f61c2d675&p=1"/></a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/dot-earth-blog-closeup-climate-extremes-and-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Green House Gas Permit</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/_yoYiE4mEhE/43545</link>
		<comments>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~3/_yoYiE4mEhE/43545#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Soos, ENN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide And Methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado River Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green House Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lcra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Llano County Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Colorado River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Colorado River Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phenomena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Point Of View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Greenhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enn.com/regulatory/article/43545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Green house gases are such materials as Carbon Dioxide and Methane that are implicated in global warming.  From a permitting point of view it is a new phenomena.  Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the first Texas Greenhouse G...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Green house gases are such materials as Carbon Dioxide and Methane that are implicated in global warming.  From a permitting point of view it is a new phenomena.  Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the first Texas Greenhouse Gas (GHG) permit for the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) Thomas C. Ferguson Power Plant in Llano County, Texas. LCRA is modernizing and expanding its plant by replacing its 37 year old unit with a new more efficient and reliable natural gas powered unit.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnvironmentalNewsNetwork/~4/_yoYiE4mEhE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/first-green-house-gas-permit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Blog: Global Warming Changing the Composition of Western Forests and the Northeastern Pacific Ocean</title>
		<link>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=dd9e1d3c592476a287973aaec22eda10</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=dd9e1d3c592476a287973aaec22eda10#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By FELICITY BARRINGER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College of Forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College of Forestry & Conservation University of Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Forest Resource Management University of British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farallon Institute for Advanced Ecosystem Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forests and Forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humboldt squid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lodgepole pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monterey Bay Aquarium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Fir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans and Seas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Northwestern States (US)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pacific ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderosa Pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard H. Waring; Nicholas C. Coops; Steven W. Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running, Steven W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William J. Sydeman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northeastern Pacific Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocean Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Northwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Forests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/04/in-changing-ecosystems-winners-and-losers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The forests of the Pacific Northwest and the oceans in the region will see significant species migration in coming decades because of climate change, two studies suggest.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The forests of the Pacific Northwest and the oceans in the region will see significant species migration in coming decades because of climate change, two studies suggest.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=dd9e1d3c592476a287973aaec22eda10&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=dd9e1d3c592476a287973aaec22eda10&p=1"/></a>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wind-power-solutions.com/green-blog-global-warming-changing-the-composition-of-western-forests-and-the-northeastern-pacific-ocean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

